"Whoever prepares no memorial for himself during his lifetime, has none after his death and is forgotten along with the sound of the bell that tolls his passing. Thus the money I spend for the perpetuation of my memory is not lost; in fact, in such matter to be sparing of money is to suppress my future memory." This statement of the Emperor Maximilian I, verbally expressed by his alter ego, Weisskunig, is the classical and famous credo of a Renaissance prince as to the necessity and importance of caring for his own memory or history, this obviously being synonymous with that of the nation.
In his manifesto, De scribenda historia danica (Om Den Danske Krønicke at bescriffue), the Danish historian, Anders Sørensen Vedel in 1578 (1581) likewise points out to the obligations of the kings and potentates to have the chronicle of their own realm described, including an account of the achievements of the regents, good or bad, as well as the royal genealogy and lineage. "In this way the true facts of mattter should be clearly illustrated." Thus presenting the res gestae as positive or negative exempla of the good or evil regiment, the national history had a basically moral function as a mirror of princes. However, the benefits of history obviously were not restricted to that. By enumerating the age-old ancestry of the prince, the national history was a political instrument of crucial importance, legitimizing his power, status and territory. Furthermore, in creating the image of the head of state, being great not only by virtue of his deeds and his noble lineage, but also as an organizer of historiography, the king's patronage in this field became a highly important element of his self-representation.
Different media or means, literal as well as pictorial or ritual, were used by the Renaissance princes to further this vital purpose. The historical image of the prince with regards to the retrospective as well as to the prospective aspects could be established e.g. by way of galleries or collections of family portraits (painted or sculptured), showing the ancestors as well as contemporary representatives of the royal line. Another way of immortalizing the past and pay due respect to the present and the future regiment were the care for important family treasures and monuments, in particular the tombs and burial places of famous ancestors, these monuments as well being relevant source material for the historiographer, as expressively pointed out by Anders Sørensen Vedel.
In Denmark attempts to establish a national historiography in continuation of Saxo's Gesta Danorum were intensified during the reign of Frederick II (1559-88), the king actively supporting the endeavors, partly from a deliberate chauvinistic or political motif in the bitter "ancestral conflict" between Denmark and the arch enemy, Sweden. Though none of them was officially equipped with the title of "Royal historiographer", historians like Hans Svaning, Iver Bertelsen or Anders Sørensen Vedel all in different ways were patronized by the government. The creating of the impressive tapestry cycle in 1581-84 in the Banqueting Hall at Kronborg is another remarkable expression, illustrating the king's 111 ancestors from king Dan to the present regent and his heir to the throne, Christian (IV).
Less noticed, however, but of equal importance as expressions of Frederick II's wish for self-representation as head of an age-old dynasty, is the attention given to a number of royal medieval necropoles, which were redecorated or restored during the 1570' and 1580'ies. One of these was the former Benedictine monastery church of Ringsted, the mausoleum for the dynasty of the Valdemars from the 12th to the 14th centuries. This church, being among "the oldest and noblest in the country", was restored at the order of Frederick II, because "many kings and queens are buried (in this place)". The restoration, comprising a renewal of the royal tombstones and a number of the wall-paintings with portraits of the kings and queens, had to a lesser degree its parallel in Ribe, where in 1576 new epitaphs for the kings Erik Emune and Christoffer I were painted with adjoining inscriptions, composed by the historian Hans Svaning. Before 1582 at least two written epitaphs were painted upon the walls in the former Cistercian monastery church at Sorø near the tombs of Valdemar Atterdag and Oluf, the works of the historians Christian Macchabæus and Iver Bertelsen. A particular interest seems to have been given to Roskilde Cathedral, which regained its status as the chosen dynastic necropole of the Danish kings during the reign of Frederick II. Not securely dated by written records, but probably belonging to the same period as the above mentioned examples were the wall paintings in the choir with matching rhymes for three royal foundators or benefactors (the first christian king of Denmark, Harald Blåtand as well as Svend Estridsen and Estrid (Margrete), including the bishop Vilhelm), exemplifying the deliberate use of a "medieval" vocabulary of forms as visual expression of dignity and age-old descent. The renovations in Roskilde, which may have included a partly restoration of the tumba of Queen Margrete, were finished before 1588, when they formed the decorative set-piece for the funeral ceremony of king Frederick II, as expressively mentioned in contemporary descriptions of this important event. Pictures or symbols of the king's glorious ancestry were also presented at the funeral, the first example in Denmark of a stately pompa funebris, following continental patterns.
The paper is developed from my research project in progress, presenting the ritual and representational aspects of the royal Danish funeral culture during the late middle ages and early modern times.
(til deltagere)